Resources


SEIRI Hosted Talks



SEIRI Publications

  • Chase, A., Clancy, H., Lachance, R., Mathison, B., Chiu, M., & Weaver, G. (2017). An interdisciplinary course- based undergraduate research experience at the United States Military Academy: Linkages between critical thinking and authenticity. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.
  • Dasgupta, A, Purzer, S. (in press). Frameworks that integrate computational thinking with STEM in K-12 Education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
  • Dasgupta, A., Rynearson, A., Purzer, S., Ehsan, H., & Cardella, M. (2017). Engineering Design and Computational Thinking in K-2 Classrooms: Evidence from Student Artifacts. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Columbus, OH.
  • Feder, E., Khan, I., Mazur G., Vernon, T., Janke, T., Newbrough, J., Shuck, L., Zhu, L., and Varma-Nelson, P. (2016). Accessing Collaborative Online Learning with Mobile Technology in Cyber Peer-Led Team Learning. EDUCAUSE Review Online, 51(2).
  • Fore, G., Hess, J. L., Coleman, M., Hahn, T., Hatcher, J., Price, M., & Sorge, B. (2018). WIP: An introduction to the Integrated Community-Engaged Learning and Ethical Reflection Framework (I-CELER). Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Hess, J. L., Beever, J., Strobel, J., & Brightman, A. O. (2017). Empathic perspective-taking and ethical decision- making in engineering ethics education. In Philosophy and Engineering: Exploring Boundaries, Expanding Connections, edited by Diane Michelfelder, Byron Newberry, and Qin Zhu, 163-179. Switzerland: Springer.
  • Hess, J. L. & Fila, N. D. (2017). Empathy in design: A discourse analysis of industrial co-creation practices. In Analysing Design Thinking: Studies of Cross-Cultural Co-Creation, edited by Bo T. Christensen, Linden J. Ball, and Kim Halskov, 483-498. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Hess, J. L. & Fila, N. D. (equal authorship, 2016). The manifestation of empathy within design: Findings from a service-learning course. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 12(1-2), 93-111.
  • Hess, J. L. & Fore, G. A. (2018). A systematic literature review of engineering ethics interventions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 551-583.
  • Hess, J. L., Fore, G., Chase, A., & Sorge, B. (in press). Measuring interpersonal competence and emotion regulation: A validation study. International Journal of Engineering Education.
  • Hess, J. L., Agarwal, M., Rizkalla, M., & Feldhaus, C. (2017). An Evaluation of a Research Experience Traineeship (RET) Program for Integrating Nanotechnology into Pre-College Curriculum. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH.
  • Hess, J. L., Beever, J., Strobel, J., & Brightman, A. O. (2017). Empathic perspective-taking and ethical decision- making in engineering ethics education. In Philosophy and Engineering: Exploring Boundaries, Expanding Connections, edited by Diane Michelfelder, Byron Newberry, and Qin Zhu, 163-179. Switzerland: Springer.
  • Hess, J. L., Chase, A., Minner, D. Rizkalla, M., & Agarwal, M. (2017). An evaluation of a Research Experience for Teachers in Nanotechnology. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Hess, J. L., Sathyanarayanan Rao, A., Fore, G., Wu, J., Tovar, A., & Anwar, S. (2018). Quantifying changes in Creativity: Findings from an engineering course on the design of complex and origami structures. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Hess, J. L., Strobel, J., & Brightman, A. (2017). The development of perspective-taking in an engineering ethics course. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 534-563.
  • Hess, J. L., Strobel, J., Pan, R., & Wachter Morris, C. A. (2017). Insights from industry: Analysis of engineers’ conceptualizations and perceptions of empathy and care. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 1128-53.
  • Hess, J. L., Chase, A., Minner, D., Rizkalla, M., & Agarwal, M. (2017). Research experience for teachers (RET) in nanotechnology at IUPUI. Frontiers in Education Annual Conference. Indianapolis, IN.
  • Leontyev, A., Chase, A., Pulos, S., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2017). Assessment of the effectiveness of instructional interventions using a comprehensive meta-analysis package, American Chemical Society. Washington, D.C., ACS Publications.
  • Piroozi, H. & Hess, J. L. (2018). The Engineering-Science Intellectual Property (ESIP) Project: A novel method for promoting innovation. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Radloff, J., Chase, A. (2018). Using expansive framing to enhance personal relevancy and engagement in science. The Hoosier Science Teacher, 41(1), 29-36.
  • Sorge, B. & Hess, J. L. (2017). Developing an understanding of the implementation and impacts of high school pre-engineering programs: Making the case for a benefit-cost analysis. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Sorge, B., Fore, G., Nunnally, E., Gibau, G., & Agarwal, M. (2017, October). Nanotechnology Experiences for Students and Teachers (NEST): Enhancing teachers' self-efficacy and their understanding of STEM career opportunities. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Stone, S., Quirke, M., & Lowe, M. S. (2018). Opportunities for faculty-librarian collaboration in an expanded dentistry curriculum. Health Information & Libraries Journal,35(2), 170-176.
  • Studer, M., Benton, M., Rogers, C., & Quirke, M. (2017). We Are All Teachers: Modeling Democratic Engagement in Faculty Development. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 23(2), 150- 154.
  • Wilson, S. B. & Varma-Nelson, P. (2016). Small groups, significant impact: A review of Peer-Led Team Learning research with implications for STEM education researchers and faculty. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(10), 1686-1702.


Discipline-Based Education Research (DBER)

Chemistry Education Research


Back to top of page

National STEM Reports

Across STEM

Science

Technology

Engineering

Mathematics


Back to top of page

Journals for DBER Research

General STEM Education Journals

Science/STEM Journals that often feature educational pieces

Chemistry Education

Biology Education

Engineering Education


Back to top of page

Diffusion of Innovations

  • Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207.
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2011). Increasing the impact and diffusion of STEM education innovations. Paper presented at the Characterizing the Impact and Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations Forum.
Back to top of page

Topical Research

Course Based Undergraduate Research

Peer-Led Team Learning


Back to top of page

Education Research Methods

  • Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA, Sage Publications.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Fore, G., & Hess, J. L. (2017, April). Teaching@IUPUI: An Introduction to Course Evaluation and Assessment. Webinar hosted by the IUPUI Center for Teaching and Learning.
  • Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2010). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Human Subjects Research Considerations in Educational Research

Back to top of page

Quantitative Research Methods

Scale Development

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Validation

  • Douglas, K. A., & Purzer, Ş. (2015). Validity: Meaning and relevancy in assessment for engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(2), 108-118.
  • Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749.

Back to top of page

Qualitative Research Methods

General

  • Baillie, C., & Douglas, E. P. (2014). Confusions and conventions: Qualitative research in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 1-7.
  • Case, J. M., & Light, G. (2011). Emerging methodoloiges in engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 186-210.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.

Case Study

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.
  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods: Sage publications.

Discourse Analysis

  • Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Phenomenology

  • van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY, SUNY Press.

Thematic Analysis

  • Braun, V. and V. Clarke (2006). "Using thematic analysis in psychology." Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2): 77-101.

Back to top of page

Mixed Methods Approaches


Back to top of page

Science of Learning

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. The Educational Forum, 50(3), 241-252.
  • Holistic Approach to Technology Enhanced Learning. Hotel Project.

Back to top of page

Science of Instruction

  • Eberlein, T., Kampmeir, J., Minderhout, V., Moog, R. S., Platt, T., Varma-Nelson, P., & White, H. B. (2008). Pedagogies of engagement in science. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 36(4), 262-273.
  • Felder, R.M. & Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Fink, L. D. (2003). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning.
  • Jacques, D. (2001). Learning in Groups: A Handbook for Improving Group Work. London, UK: Kogan Page.
  • Pallas, A. M., Neumann, A., & Campbell, C. M. (2017). Policis and practices to support undergraduate teaching improvement. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts & Science.
  • Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Wiggins, G. and J. McTighe (2005). Understanding by Design (2 nd Ed). Alexandria, VA, ASCD.

Back to top of page

Science of Teaching and Learning (SoTL)


Back to top of page
STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute
IUPUI
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research
755 W. Michigan Street
University Library, UL 1123
Indianapolis, IN 46202-2800
Tel:317-278-0168
Email: seiri@iupui.edu
Give Now